Using Web Conferencing is the next best medium for communication if
face to face dialogue is not possible.
Through the use of Skype, it is possible to communicate beyond what is
reflected through written email dialogue.
Facial expressions and gestures enhance one’s ability to deliver and receive
a message, which enables the professional relationship to become dynamic. Much of my dialogue with my learning partner focused on the topic of ‘rote’
learning and how it inhibits transformational learning. We talked about principles of critical
thinking, as reflected in the article, “Critical Theory and Holistic Education:
Carrying on the Conversation” by Kathleen Kesson. Some of the factors that were discussed
related to the importance of learners embracing the process of learning for the
purpose of learning knowledge and to grow as a person. On the flip side, we considered how our role
as educators is to prompt an emotional climate where critical thinking is
invited through journaling, class discussions, and assignments.
As Lawrence and I compared our teaching experiences, it became quite
evident that some fields lend themselves to critical thinking, in particular
reflection, more naturally than others.
As I talked about early childhood education, it was evident that
reflection is a key element of an educator’s daily practice. Reflection is linked to professional
judgement and the ability for educators to look beyond their own beliefs,
attitudes, and values to consider the perspectives of the children and their
families who attend the centre. As an
educator, facilitating learning within a post-secondary classroom, it is
important to incorporate reflection in the learning process to enhance the
potential that students will develop an appreciation for the reflection process
and hopefully incorporate it into their professional practice. To the contrary, it may not be as easy to
incorporate reflection in courses such as graphic design, engineering, or
mathematics. Yes, it is true that
various opinions can still be shared, which is an aspect of critical thinking;
however, the course content is more factual or is designed to develop an
applied skill. By no means did we reach
conclusions on how we could incorporate reflection in applied skill
courses. The value of the conversation was
rooted in asking more questions for us to continue thinking about. Is reflection a mandatory component of higher
level thinking? Do all instructors in
all fields of learning consider critical thinking as a part of the learning
process? How does the ability to engage
in higher level thinking contribute to the quest for world democracy? Through the discussion of life experiences as
instructors, there was opportunity to expand our perspectives and consider
various learning environments and fields of learning.
Just like in a physical classroom, the depth of dialogue was dependent of preparation of our materials and the willingness to share life experiences. Physical distance was not a barrier in being able to converse with one another as colleagues, thus it appeared web-conferencing was an effective means to draw learners together.
Kesson, Kathleen. (2011). Critical Theory and Holistic Education: Carrying on the Conversation. Encounter Summer 2011, Vol. 24 Issue 2, 95-114.
Just like in a physical classroom, the depth of dialogue was dependent of preparation of our materials and the willingness to share life experiences. Physical distance was not a barrier in being able to converse with one another as colleagues, thus it appeared web-conferencing was an effective means to draw learners together.
Kesson, Kathleen. (2011). Critical Theory and Holistic Education: Carrying on the Conversation. Encounter Summer 2011, Vol. 24 Issue 2, 95-114.